Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2022

Still Standing

Personnel changes on the Supreme Court of Ga. over the past 15 years have coincided with increased reliance on federal law and terminology, even when interpreting Georgia state law...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

State or federal court, what's the difference?

Personnel changes on the Supreme Court of Ga. over the past 15 years have coincided with increased reliance on federal law and terminology, even when interpreting Georgia state law and the Georgia Constitution. In Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Henry County Bd. of Commissioners ("SCV"), decided today, the Court pulled back from its recent wholesale reliance on federal principles of standing when interpreting Georgia statutes.

A plaintiff might sue in federal court because of a perceived favorable forum, compared to state court. Apart from subject-matter jurisdiction (a federal question is at issue, or the case is between parties from different states), federal court requires the plaintiff to have standing, which means showing an injury that the court can redress in its decision. Generally, a plaintiff can't simply sue in federal court because of disagreement with government action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from