In Railey v. Sunset Food Mart, Inc., -- F.4th --,
No. 21-2533, 2021 WL 4808222 (7th Cir. Oct. 15, 2021), the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district
court's order remanding a class action asserting claims under
the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act because the removal
was untimely. Beyond the specific holding, the Court's
opinion serves as a useful reminder about some of the contours
around removal of class actions, including under the Class Action
Fairness Act (CAFA). We discuss some of those key principles below,
through the lens of the Court's decision.
Appellate courts can review remand orders in some
situations. Though appellate courts typically lack
jurisdiction to review remand orders, they have the discretion to
do so for orders remanding a case removed under CAFA, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1453(c)(1), and are “free to consider any potential
error in the district court's decision.” Slip op. 4-5,
9 (quoting Brill v. Countrywide Home