Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2016

Second Circuit Finds No "Exceptional Case" For General Jurisdiction Under Daimler And Vacates $655M Judgment

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a $655 million jury award related to terror attacks in Israel, finding the lower court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Stosh Silivos is a litigation attorney in Holland & Knights New York office

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a $655 million jury award related to terror attacks in Israel, finding the lower court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants. In Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Organization,1 a unanimous panel continued the trend of limiting the exercise of general jurisdiction and held that the suit was not an "exceptional case" as discussed in Daimler AG v. Bauman2 because the defendants were not "at home" in the United States. The court also determined that specific jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant's suit-related conduct did not create a substantial connection with the United States. Thus, the court remanded the action to the district court with instructions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from