Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2026

SDNY: Client's GenAI-Generated Legal Research Not Protected By Privilege

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

A new ruling from the Southern District of New York has implications for anyone using GenAI tools in connection with litigation, government investigations, or legal advice.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A new ruling from the Southern District of New York has implications for anyone using GenAI tools in connection with litigation, government investigations, or legal advice. On February 17, 2026, in U.S. v. Heppner, Judge Jed Rakoff issued a written opinion holding that electronic documents a defendant created using the consumer version of the GenAI tool Claude are not shielded by attorney-client privilege or work product protection when seized pursuant to a search warrant at the defendant's premises. This alert breaks down the court's reasoning and provides practical steps to help preserve privilege when using GenAI tools.

What Happened

Defendant Bradley Heppner used the consumer version of Claude to conduct legal research in anticipation of litigation after receiving a grand jury subpoena. The defendant incorporated communications and information from his attorneys into his prompts, intended to share the GenAI outputs with counsel, and ultimately did so.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from