Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2016

Rule 37(E) And Spoliation Sanctions Under The Amended Rules

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

E-Discovery counsel Samantha V. Ettari's article "Rule 37(e) and Spoliation Sanctions Under the Amended Rules," appeared in the February 1, 2016, issue of the New York Law Journal.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

E-Discovery counsel Samantha V. Ettari's article "Rule 37(e) and Spoliation Sanctions Under the Amended Rules," appeared in the February 1, 2016, issue of the New York Law Journal. In December 2015, an expanded Rule 37(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect, which instructs on remedies and sanctions available for spoliation of electronically stored information (ESI). The remedies and sanctions potentially available for negligent and intentional spoliation are clearer, and intended to result in more uniform application. In this article, Ms. Ettari examines the first ruling issued under revised Rule 37(e) - the Jan. 12, 2016, decision issued in the Southern District of New York in CAT3 v. Black Lineage, which analyzed the appropriate remedies available under the revised rule for the intentional spoliation of email content, and awarded sanctions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from