Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 NOVEMBER 2023

Part II-C Of Bittner: The Dark Lining Behind The Silver Cloud

This morning, the Supreme Court issued what lawyers correctly regard as a taxpayer-friendly opinion in the case of Bittner v. United States.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This morning, the Supreme Court issued what lawyers correctly regard as a taxpayer-friendly opinion in the case of Bittner v. United States.

In that case, by a vote of 5-4, the Court held the maximum penalty that the Government can impose upon a person who nonwillfully fails to file FinCEN Form 114, "Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts", more commonly referred to as the "FBAR," to be $10,000 for each unfiled FBAR. Since the law requires filing of an FBAR on an annual basis, the Court's ruling generally means that the Government can impose a maximum nonwillful penalty of no more than $10,000 per year. The Court rejected the Government's argument that the maximum penalty should be $10,000 for each bank account that the person should have included on the unfiled FBAR. Thus, in the Government's view, a person who, during the year in question, held 17 foreign accounts but did not file an FBAR should be subject to a maximum nonwillful penalty of $170,000. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from