ARTICLE · 26 DECEMBER 2024
Ninth Circuit Dismisses Adtech Class Action For Lack Of Standing
On December 17, 2024, in Daghaly, et al. v. Bloomingdales.com, LLC, No. 23-4122, 2024 WL 5134350 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2024), the Ninth Circuit ruled that a plaintiff lacked Article III...
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Duane Morris Takeaways: On December 17,
2024, in Daghaly, et al. v. Bloomingdales.com, LLC, No. 23-4122,
2024 WL 5134350 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2024), the Ninth Circuit ruled that a plaintiff lacked Article
III standing to bring her class action complaint alleging that an
online retailer's use of website advertising technology
disclosed website visitors' browsing activities in violation of
the California Invasion of Privacy Act and other statutes. The
ruling is significant because it shows that adtech claims cannot be
brought in federal court without specifying the plaintiffs' web
browsing activities allegedly disclosed.
Background
This case is one of the hundreds of class actions that
plaintiffs have filed nationwide alleging that Meta Pixel, Google
Analytics, and other similar software embedded in defendants'
websites secretly captured plaintiffs' web browsing data and
sent it to Meta, Google, and other online advertising agencies.
This software, often called
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.
View source