ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2026
Ninth Circuit Affirms Denial Of Motion To Compel Arbitration Imposed After Class Certification
On January 28, 2026, in Avery, et al. v. TEKsystems, Inc., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 2091, Case No. 24-5810 (9th Cir. Jan 27, 2026), the Ninth Circuit issued an order affirming a district court's denial of an employer's motion to compel arbitration.
United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Duane Morris Takeaways: On January 28,
2026, in Avery, et al. v. TEKsystems, Inc., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS
2091, Case No. 24-5810 (9th Cir. Jan 27, 2026), the Ninth
Circuit issued an order affirming a district court's denial
of an employer's motion to compel arbitration. TEK, an IT
staffing company, appealed a decision by the district court that
declined to enforce arbitration under an agreement it had rolled
out after a class certification ruling by a group of recruiters
alleging unpaid overtime. The Ninth Circuit found that TEK had
issued misleading communications with the arbitration agreement,
and had inverted the class opt-out proceedings by requiring
putative class members to opt out of the agreement to remain in the
litigation. The decision highlights the impact that the choice of
language employers utilize in communicating about arbitration
agreements has on future litigation and underscores the authority
of district courts in procedural considerations when an
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.
View source