Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2018

Litigation Tourists Visit New York And Are Sent Packing

A few weeks ago, we reported on another in a line of Missouri appellate decisions rejecting the ability of Missouri courts to try the claims of non-Missouri residents ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A few weeks ago, we reported on another in a line of Missouri appellate decisions rejecting the ability of Missouri courts to try the claims of non-Missouri residents against non-Missouri manufacturers of baby powder not used in Missouri. The next day a jury in the same trial court awarded billions in a trial of 22 baby powder users. This was all part of a long saga of litigation tourism to the Show Me State.

It turns out that some plaintiffs prefer to go ever upwards with their baby powder claims in New York state court. We are not talking about New York residents suing in their friendly neighborhood court, we are talking about litigation tourists coming to the Big Apple with hopes of big awards. The problem–for them–is that New York state courts are supposed to apply personal jurisdiction according to the same standards that the Missouri appellate courts and the United States Supreme Court have been lately. We received two very similar decisions from a friend of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from