Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2022

Litigation Does Not Necessarily Vitiate Director's Absolute Right To Inspect

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Explore more from Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

This space has previously discussed the question of just how absolute a director's "absolute" right of of inspection really is.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This space has previously discussed the question of just how absolute a director's "absolute" right of of inspection really is. See When Is A Director's Inspection Right Not Absolute? and Defining The Metes And Bounds Of A Director's Absolute Right To Inspect. Now, we have a new decision, Fowler v. Golden Pacific Bancorp, Inc., Cal. Ct. App. Case No. C092179 (June 23, 2022).

The case involved a director's demand for inspection that was made after the corporation had sued the director. When the corporation refused to permit inspection, the director tried to obtain substantially the same information through discovery in the ongoing litigation. After the corporation refused to produce the information and the director's motion to compel was denied, the director filed an action for peremptory writ of mandate to enforce his "absolute" right of inspection under Section 1602 of the California Corporations Code.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from