Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2019

Increased Scrutiny Means Increased Costs: Amended Rule 23 And Class Settlement Approval

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Advisory Committee acknowledges that courts have established and applied similar factors that reflect these considerations.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Short

The Situation: Recently amended Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2) requires courts to analyze several factors in evaluating whether to approve class settlements.

The Result: Class action settlements that would previously glide through the approval process are facing heightened court scrutiny, including at the preliminary approval phase, with increased costs and risks to defendants.

Looking Ahead: In structuring class settlements, defendants must weigh the benefits of favorable settlement terms against the risks and costs associated with increased judicial intervention. Parties must invest early in the litigation, including potentially frontloading discovery and involving a mediator, to lay the groundwork for justifying favorable settlement terms to increasingly skeptical courts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from