Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2015

I Think We’re Alone Now: Applying The Common-Interest Privilege When No Litigation Is Pending

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

In general, the presence of a third party (not the attorney or her agent and not the client or her agent) will preclude application of the attorney-client privilege.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Recently, the New York Appellate Division broadened that state's common-interest privilege doctrine. In Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 124 A.D.3d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2014), the court removed the requirement that the communicators be co-parties in open litigation and allowed the privilege to be asserted in a merger/acquisition scenario. The court noted that "in today's business environment, pending or reasonably anticipated litigation is not a necessary element of the common-interest privilege." "[B]usiness entities often have important legal interests to protect even without the looming specter of litigation," the court said. Id. at 130-31. New York state courts now agree with the "overwhelming majority" of federal courts to decide this question. Id. at 134.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from