Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

For Want Of A Word: Be Careful When Drafting!

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Most language we fight about when negotiating complicated contractual arrangements never leads to an expensive courtroom dispute.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

October 4, 2023 - Most language we fight about when negotiating complicated contractual arrangements never leads to an expensive courtroom dispute. But, every once in a while, we receive a scary reminder that every word can count for your client...

A "collection" provision of a 2020 License and Settlement Agreement between Honeywell International and OPTO Electronic Company provided that, "[i]n the event a Party must institute an action to collect any overdue payments, that party shall be entitled to its fees and costs incurred with respect to such action." On September 27, 2023, the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina found – no doubt to Honeywell's unwelcome surprise – that this provision did not entitle Honeywell to recover its legal expenses following a payment collection dispute with OPTO, relying mainly on the fact that the contract language at issue referred to "fees" generally, and not "attorneys' fees" or "legal fees."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from