October 4, 2023 - Most language we fight about
when negotiating complicated contractual arrangements never leads
to an expensive courtroom dispute. But, every once in a while, we
receive a scary reminder that every word can count for your
client...
A "collection" provision of a 2020 License and
Settlement Agreement between Honeywell International and OPTO
Electronic Company provided that, "[i]n the event a Party must
institute an action to collect any overdue payments, that party
shall be entitled to its fees and costs incurred with respect to
such action." On September 27, 2023, the United States
District Court for the Western District of North Carolina found
– no doubt to Honeywell's unwelcome surprise – that
this provision did not entitle Honeywell to
recover its legal expenses following a payment collection dispute
with OPTO, relying mainly on the fact that the contract language at
issue referred to "fees" generally, and not
"attorneys' fees" or "legal fees."