Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2026

Federal Evidence Rulemaking On AI Hits Pause: An EDVA Update

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules has declined to advance proposed federal rules governing AI-generated evidence, while the Eastern District of Virginia confirms it will not issue AI-specific standing orders. This development leaves practitioners without uniform guidance on handling machine-generated evidence and alleged deepfakes in federal litigation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In our March post, we observed that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“EDVA”) has not adopted any district-wide or judge-specific standing orders governing the use of generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) in court filings. Recent remarks by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema at the Federal Bar Association Northern Virginia Chapter’s Annual Luncheon and State of the Court Address on June 8, 2026, confirm that this case-specific approach will continue: the Alexandria Division does not plan to issue AI-specific standing orders, although lawyers who “ghost cite” cases should expect sanctions.1 That approach is consistent with the national rulemaking process, in which the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules (“Advisory Committee”) declined to advance rules governing AI-generated evidence.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from