Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2026

Email Subject Line Litigation: Washington’s CEMA Isn’t The Only Game In Town

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Plaintiffs' firms are systematically targeting companies with class action lawsuits under state anti-spam statutes, claiming marketing email subject lines are false or misleading. Indiana's Deceptive Commercial Electronic Mail Act has emerged...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

If you send marketing emails, you’re probably already aware of Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”). Since the Washington Supreme Court’s decision last year in Brown v. Old Navy LLC, plaintiffs’ firms have filed nearly 100 class actions under CEMA, all based on the same theory: the subject line of a marketing email was “false or misleading” because it promised a discount or a free gift, or promoted time-limited offers. At $500 per email in statutory damages, the exposure adds up fast. 

But if you thought Washington’s CEMA was the only law of its kind, think again. A recent amendment to CEMA is reducing statutory penalties to $100 per email and adding a requirement that the sender knew the email was false or misleading (effective June 11, 2026). That makes other states’ CEMA-style laws much more attractive. At the top of the list: Indiana’s.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from