Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2007

Eleventh Circuit Holds That Beryllium Sensitization May Be Cognizable “Injury”

As previously reported, see "In Re" Products Liability at 13 (July 2006), a federal trial judge in Georgia ruled in March of last year that beryllium sensitivity is not a compensable injury under Georgia law.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
David Wallace
David Wallace
Philip Pfeffer
Philip Pfeffer

See

Parker v. Brush Wellman, 2007 WL 1149982 (11th Cir. April 18, 2007), vacating in part 420 F. Supp. 2d 1355 (N.D. Ga. 2006)

As previously reported, see In Re Products Liability at 13 (July 2006), a federal trial judge in Georgia ruled in March of last year that beryllium sensitivity is not a compensable injury under Georgia law. On April 18, 2007, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated that determination, finding that a genuine dispute of material fact existed on whether beryllium sensitization constitutes "a current disease or impairment and on the probability that the condition will later develop into" chronic beryllium disease.

Proceedings In The District Court

The named plaintiffs commenced this putative class action on behalf of otherwise asymptomatic individuals seeking recovery for "sub-clinical, cellular, and sub-cellular damages" supposedly caused by exposure to respirable beryllium associated with the manufacture or use of products containing beryllium in the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from