Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 FEBRUARY 2020

Decision In In Re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig. (E.D. Mich.)

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Explore more from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Whether consumers seeking monetary and injunctive relief due to an alleged design defect could be certified as a nationwide class under Rule 23(b)(2) and as 16 elemental sub-classes under Rule 23(b)(3) or in the alternative, ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Issue

Whether consumers seeking monetary and injunctive relief due to an alleged design defect could be certified as a nationwide class under Rule 23(b)(2) and as 16 elemental sub-classes under Rule 23(b)(3) or in the alternative, 23 state-by-state sub-classes.1

Background

Plaintiffs brought a consumer class action in 2016 after FCA US LLC (Chrysler) announced it was recalling approximately 1.1 million vehicles after discovering an issue with the gear shift that could cause these vehicles to roll away after the driver had exited because the park function would not engage as expected. Plaintiffs sought to certify a nationwide class in the Eastern District of Michigan under Rule 23(b)(2) to require defendant to take corrective action to fix the vehicles. They also sought to certify 16 subclasses under Rule 23(b)(3) that they proposed to organize by commonality of certain elements of their causes of action under various state laws. In the alternative, they

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from