Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2020

Common Interest Doctrine And Attorney-Client Privilege Protect Distributor's Email Communication With Defendant

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

In a January 14, 2020, order, the Northern District of Illinois granted in part and denied in part, a plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents withheld as privileged.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a January 14, 2020, order, the Northern District of Illinois granted in part and denied in part, a plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents withheld as privileged. The court found that an email between the defendant and its third-party distributor concerning litigation strategy was protected by both attorney-client privilege and the common interest doctrine. In contrast, the court found additional emails involving only business discussions to be unprotected from disclosure.

Plaintiff, Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. ("Choice") sued Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc. and Contec Medical Systems Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Contec") for infringing Choice's patents related to fingertip pulse oximeters. After the complaint had been filed, an attorney for Choice sent cease-and-desist letters to six Contec distributors, including Veridian Healthcare LLC ("Veridian"). Veridian, in turn, sought advice via email from Contec regarding how best

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from