Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2025

A Year After Loper Bright: Lessons From A Legal Shake-Up

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the US Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old doctrine established in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What You Need To Know In A Minute Or Less

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the US Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old doctrine established in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which had directed federal courts to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute that the agency administers. Chevron deference was a cornerstone of modern administrative law—a pragmatic presumption that ambiguities found in statutes reflected Congress' implicit desire to delegate legislative power to agencies to fill in the details. This power sometimes meant that a statute could legitimately be read to have multiple meanings, depending on which administration was reading it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from