Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2026

Understanding “Primarily Merely A Surname” U.S. Trademark Registration Refusals

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Contributor
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman (CLL) is recognized worldwide as a leading intellectual property law and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

The U.S. Trademark Act prohibits registration of marks that are "primarily merely a surname," but determining whether a mark qualifies as such involves analyzing multiple factors including public perception...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The U.S. Trademark Act prohibits a mark that is “primarily merely a surname” from registration on the Principal Register. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(4). The issue is whether the primary significance of the mark as a whole to the purchasing public is as a surname, which is a question of fact.

Are TUGENDHAT or GOLIA unregistrable surnames? (Hint: That may depend, in part, on the Applicant’s own advertising or promotional materials or Applicant’s own name.)

Several non-exclusive questions are considered in evaluating the primary significance to the purchasing public of a surname mark:

  1. Is it a principal’s name used in a manner that reveals its significance as a surname;
  2. Does the term have an ordinary language meaning;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from