Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2026

Functionality Can Bar Registration Of A Single-Color Trademark

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Contributor
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman (CLL) is recognized worldwide as a leading intellectual property law and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board recently affirmed that a specific shade of bright green (Pantone 2297C) cannot be registered as a trademark for construction tripod legs due to functionality concerns. The decision highlights the complex interplay between color marks, safety features, and competitive disadvantage in trademark law, examining how high-visibility colors serve essential purposes beyond source identification.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) saw green when an applicant tried to register a particular shade of green (Pantone 2297C) on the Supplemental Register (for descriptive marks capable of designating the source of a product or service) as a trademark applied to the legs of a “construction and surveyor tripod.” 

The TTAB affirmed the Examining Attorney’s determination that the single color was functional. As such, the proposed mark was not capable of designating source and could not be registered on either the Principal or Supplemental Register even though the Applicant claimed to have used the mark for about 5 years before the filing date of its application.

1843480 a.jpg

Background for finding a mark is functional

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from