Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2020

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – August 2020

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Conversant sued Apple for allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,477,151 (the "'151 patent"), which Conversant obtained from Nokia.

United StatesIntellectual Property

August 4, 2020

Conversant Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple, Inc., No. 19-2039

Conversant sued Apple for allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,477,151 (the "'151 patent"), which Conversant obtained from Nokia. At trial, Conversant won on the issues of validity and infringement. Apple also challenged the enforceability of the '151 patent, losing at the district court but securing a remand on appeal. On remand, the district court found the '151 patent unenforceable under the doctrine of involuntary waiver. As part of its decision, the district court concluded that: (1) Nokia convinced the European Telecommunications Standards Institute ("ETSI") to include an idea in the General Packet Radio Service ("GPRS") standard, while Nokia also filed patent applications covering the same idea (including the application that matured into the '151 patent), (2) under ETSI rules, Nokia had an obligation to disclose those applications to the ETSI, (3) Nokia concealed those

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from