Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MAY 2018

Precedential No. 18: TTAB Extends Safer Rule To Internet Evidence During Ex Parte Prosecution

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Observing that there are no precedential decisions regarding an examining attorney's failure to properly submit Internet evidence, the Board ruled that both applicants ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Observing that there are no precedential decisions regarding an examining attorney's failure to properly submit Internet evidence, the Board ruled that both applicants and examining attorneys must include the URL and the date the webpage was accessed. If an applicant does not object to the examining attorney's failure to do so, "the Board will consider the website for whatever probative value it may have." If the applicant fails to do so without objection from the examining attorney, the Board may consider the objection waived. In re Mueller Sports Medicine, Inc., Serial No. 87209946 (May 16, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. Bergsman).

Until Safer Inc. v. OMS Inv. Inc., there was no requirement that a party include a webpage address when introducing a webpage into evidence in an inter partes proceedings. [Now codified in Trademark Rule 2.122(e)]. The TMEP adopted the Safer requirements for examining attorneys in ex parte proceedings. TMEP §

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from