Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2026

Pepsi Case Could Reshape How Courts Judge Trademark Strength

A U.S. Supreme Court review of Rise Brewing's trademark infringement case against PepsiCo could fundamentally alter who determines brand strength in trademark disputes. The case examines whether judges or juries should assess trademark distinctiveness, with implications for how businesses select and enforce their marks. Existing marks and registration statements may significantly impact a company's ability to protect its trademark rights.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Business owners invest significant time and resources in building brands that customers recognize and trust. A strong trademark can become a valuable business asset that endures for generations.

When adopting a new trademark, companies should pay close attention to third-party use in similar and related fields, as that use may play an important role in future enforcement matters.

To prevail in a trademark infringement lawsuit, a trademark owner must prove that the other party’s actions are likely to cause consumer confusion as to the source of the goods or services. Courts evaluate consumer confusion using several factors, including the strength of the mark, the degree of similarity between marks, and the relatedness of the goods or services.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from