Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2014

No Presumption Of Irreparable Harm

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

In deciding motions for preliminary injunction in a trade mark infringement case, courts have traditionally held that irreparable harm to a trade mark owner was presumed once a finding was made that that a defendant’s use of the mark at issue is likely to cause confusion.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In deciding motions for preliminary injunction in a trade mark infringement case, courts have traditionally held that irreparable harm to a trade mark owner was presumed once a finding was made that that a defendant's use of the mark at issue is likely to cause confusion. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, however, in the case Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v Florida Entertainment Management, Inc, recently broke away from past precedent and took a different approach to the standard for granting injunctive relief in a trade mark infringement matter.

Herb Reed Enterprises involved the use of the mark The Platters as the name of a musical group. The District Court had granted the plaintiff a preliminary injunction against the defendant's use of the mark, holding that the plaintiff had satisfied the requirements for obtaining injunctive relief, namely, that the plaintiff had established a likelihood of success on the merits and that it was likely to suffer

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from