Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2007

Medimmune Challenge To Genentech Patent Permitted To Continue

On January 9, 2007, Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al; reversing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in an 8-1 decision. Justice Thomas was the sole dissenter.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On January 9, 2007, Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al; reversing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in an 8-1 decision. Justice Thomas was the sole dissenter. The Supreme Court originally granted cert to consider the issue of whether, under the Declaratory Judgment (DJ) Act (the Act), a licensee in good standing must breach its license prior to challenging the underlying patent.

In 1997, Genentech granted a patent license to MedImmune in a patent covering the production of chimeric antibodies and a then-pending patent application (now the Cabilly II patent) covering the coexpression of immunoglobulin chains in recombinant host cells. Several years later MedImmune began to manufacture Synagis, a drug administered to infants and young children to protect against respiratory tract diseases. Soon after the Cabilly II patent issued, whereupon Genentech informed MedImmune of its belief that Synagis was

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from