Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2022

E.D. Va. Affirms TTAB: Timberland Boot Design Is Functional And Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In an appeal by way of civil action under Section 1071(b), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia upheld the TTAB's decision [TTABlogged here] affirming a refusal to register certain features...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In an appeal by way of civil action under Section 1071(b), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia upheld the TTAB's decision [TTABlogged here] affirming a refusal to register certain features of Timberland's boot design on the ground that the proposed mark for "footwear, namely, lace-up boots" lacked acquired distinctiveness. Although the Board declined to rule on the USPTO's Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal, the district court affirmed that refusal as well. TBL Licensing, LLC v. Vidal, Civil Case No. l:21CV681 (E.D. Va. December 8, 2022).

1261504a.jpg

The boot design at issue includes a "bulbous toe box," a "tube-shaped ankle collar," a "two-toned outsole," an hourglass-shaped rear heel panel, and other elements: a total of eight specific features.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from