Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2008

Don’t Be An Easy Mark: Steps To Avoid Substantial Damages For False Patent Marking

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A recent district court decision on false patent marking shows how easy it is for a company to be exposed to expensive litigation and large statutory damages if it is not careful in monitoring how its products are marked.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Alex Merchant
Alex Merchant
Sunil Kulkarni
Sunil Kulkarni
Author LinkedIn connections

A recent district court decision on false patent marking shows how easy it is for a company to be exposed to expensive litigation and large statutory damages if it is not careful in monitoring how its products are marked. But as we discuss below, it is also easy to reduce this risk.

Patent marking is an effective method of providing notice to infringers of product patents, as required under 35 U.S.C. section 287(a) in order to collect damages for infringement. (Patent marking is not necessary for process patents.)

But a patentee must be cautious to avoid liability under the false marking statute, 35 U.S.C. section 292, which prohibits the use of a patent mark on an "unpatented article" with the intent to deceive. The penalty for false marking is statutory damages of up to $500 per "offense." The offense can, in theory, be defined as every article that is marked. Any person – not just someone with

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from