Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2015

Court Finds Dow Claims Clearly Indefinite

As explained in the Federal Circuit decision, the "slope of strain hardening coefficient" is a parameter devised by the inventor, and not previously used in the art.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Dow Chemical Co. v. Nova Chemicals Corp., the Federal Circuit held claims reciting a limitation that could be calculated in several ways indefinite where the patent claims, specification, and prosecution history failed to indicate which method should be used. For those wondering whether the “reasonable certainty” standard set forth in the Supreme Court’s Nautilus decision will have any real-world impact, this case shows that it can, since the Federal Circuit previously upheld the same claims under the “insolubly ambiguous” standard.

The Dow Patent Claims At Issue

Claim 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,847,053 is representative of the claims challenged on indefiniteness grounds:

6. An ethylene polymer composition comprising

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from