Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2026

Chief Judge Signals Changes May Be Coming For The Ordinary Observer Test

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On February 2, 2026, a split Federal Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment of no design-patent infringement issued by a Maine federal court. Range of Motion Prods., LLC v. Armaid Co. Inc., No. 2023-2427, 2026 WL 261890 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 2, 2026).

United StatesIntellectual Property

On February 2, 2026, a split Federal Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment of no design-patent infringement issued by a Maine federal court. Range of Motion Prods., LLC v. Armaid Co. Inc., No. 2023-2427, 2026 WL 261890 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 2, 2026). The panel majority's analysis was routine under the governing framework for assessing design-patent claim construction and infringement set forth in the Federal Circuit's 2008 en banc decision in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa. Chief Judge Moore, however, dissented and frankly called for revisiting Egyptian Goddess and overhauling the "ordinary observer" standard—a move that signals big changes may be coming for design-patent litigation, both in the district courts and the PTAB.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from