Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2015

Australia Non-Compete Update: The Difference Between Winning And Losing Restraint Litigation Is Often Good Housekeeping

An enforceable restraint of trade can be a key business asset. Or some might think about it as an insurance policy.

United StatesIntellectual Property

An enforceable restraint of trade can be a key business asset. Or some might think about it as an insurance policy. The capacity to preserve customer connections, protect confidential information and discourage key executives from setting up their own business or moving to a competitor can be critical to information rich businesses operating in a competitive market. Ensuring the currency of your restraint provisions is an important exercise in risk management.

Experience in this area demonstrates one key distinction which separates cases where restraints are successfully upheld and those where compromise outcomes are achieved. In successful cases, typically, the restraint provision has been drafted quite neatly around the key protectable interests. When seeking to enforce a restraint, an employer will be required to show there is a protectable interest capable of supporting the restraint. This is the first limb of the test for enforceability. The scope, duration and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from