Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2023

Fischl v. Pacific Life Ins. Co.

In Fischl v. Pacific Life Ins. Co., 94 Cal.App.5th 108 (Aug. 3, 2023), the California Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Pacific Life...

United StatesInsurance

(Trial Court Correctly Granted Summary Judgment To Life Insurer Because, While Regulations Require A Suitability Analysis To Be Conducted Before Variable Life Insurance Is Issued, They Permit An Insurer Issuing Such Insurance To Rely On The Suitability Analysis Conducted By A Licensed Broker Instead Of Conducting Independent Analysis)

(September 2023) - In Fischl v. Pacific Life Ins. Co., 94 Cal.App.5th 108 (Aug. 3, 2023), the California Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Pacific Life in a case alleging Pacific had a duty imposed by Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, section 2534.2(c) to independently analyze the plaintiff-applicant's suitability for the variable life insurance policy that remained actionable notwithstanding a previous release given by the plaintiff.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from