Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 DECEMBER 2019

Appellate Court Grants Summary Judgment Obligating Coverage For Underlying Copyright Actions

In a recent cryptic coverage decision, a New York state intermediate appellate court reversed an order denying summary judgment to a media policyholder and held that the insurance companies

United StatesInsurance

In a recent cryptic coverage decision, a New York state intermediate appellate court reversed an order denying summary judgment to a media policyholder and held that the insurance companies were obligated to provide insurance coverage for underlying copyright infringement actions. Although cryptic, the decision addresses exclusions and their applicability to media insurance policies.

In McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. v. Illinois National Insurance Co., No. 655708/16 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep’t Dec. 17, 2019), a media company was sued for copyright infringement in underlying actions. The media company had purchased a series of claims-made multimedia insurance policies, which covered a wide variety of potential liability, including copyright infringement. The policy, as most do, had several exclusions. The parties disputed coverage for the underlying actions and cross-moved for summary judgment. The motion court denied both motions, holding that there were issues of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from