Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MAY 2024

'Occurrence' – Ohio

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a state trial court decision granting summary judgement against Chiquita Brands International, Inc (Chiquita)...

United StatesInsurance

Travelers Property Cas. Corp. v. Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.
Nos. C-230094, C-230095 and C-230107, 2024 WL 2106139 (Oh. 1st Dist. Hamilton County, May 10, 2024)

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a state trial court decision granting summary judgement against Chiquita Brands International, Inc (Chiquita), declaring that its insurers had no duty to indemnify Chiquita for numerous claims that it settled arising from the Anti-Terrorism Act because there was not an "occurrence."

The appellate court consolidated two actions for declaratory judgment inquiring on the duty to indemnify, initiated by two groups of Chiquita's insurers -- one group led by Travelers Property Casualty Corporation (Travelers) and the other led by Federal Insurance Company (Federal).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from