Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2010

New Media, Technology and the Law (July 2010)

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

An amendment to the Copyright Act that grants copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States is not violative of the First Amendment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Edited by Jeffrey D. Neuburger

COPYRIGHT

No First Amendment Violation in Statute Restoring Copyright Rights of Foreign Authors

An amendment to the Copyright Act that grants copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States is not violative of the First Amendment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled. The amendment restores copyright rights in foreign works that were formerly in the public domain in the United States for failure to comply with formalities, lack of subject matter protection, or lack of national eligibility. The court concluded that the amendment is a content-neutral regulation of speech, entitled to intermediate scrutiny under the First Amendment, and sustainable if it "advances important governmental interests unrelated to the suppression of free speech and does not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further those interests." The court held that the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from