In two government contracts appeals argued remotely on June 1,
the US government asked the US Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit to endorse controversial theories of waiver and
jurisdiction in order to avoid the merits of contractor breach
claims. While oral argument does not always reflect the decision to
come, the Federal Circuit panels seem appropriately skeptical of
the government's arguments.
In The Boeing Company v. US,1 the government argued
that Boeing waived its right to challenge the validity of a
regulation in a breach of contract action because Boeing entered
into the contract without first challenging the regulation through
a separate legal action. During oral argument, all three panel
members expressed concern with the government's theory.