Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2017

Anti-Money Laundering Expectations In 2017

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Recent agency guidance, rulemakings, and enforcement actions—all issued prior to the change in administrations—demonstrate the financial regulatory agencies' commitment to enforcing the Bank Secrecy Act...

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

Recent agency guidance, rulemakings, and enforcement actions—all issued prior to the change in administrations—demonstrate the financial regulatory agencies' commitment to enforcing the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations (BSA), and, in particular, their willingness to hold lead compliance professionals personally accountable. Add to that the new administration's rhetoric of fighting terrorism and bolstering national security, and financial institutions should expect an upsurge of anti-money laundering (AML) supervision and enforcement in the coming years.

I. Recent Actions Imposing Personal Liability

Two recent enforcement actions against financial institutions and their AML officers support this expectation and should serve as stark warnings to individuals charged with ensuring compliance with the BSA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from