Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 AUGUST 2025

But Who Can Unlearn All The Facts That I've Learned: Facts Matter For Summary Judgment

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

In a recent foreclosure action, Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC ("Lakeview") sought summary judgment against Defendant Andrew Branley ("Branley").

United StatesFinance and Banking

In a recent foreclosure action, Plaintiff Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC (“Lakeview”) sought summary judgment against Defendant Andrew Branley (“Branley”). Lakeview claimed that Branley executed a Note to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) on June 12, 2013, in the principal amount of $317,091.00, secured by a mortgage and a Consolidation, Extension and Modification Agreement (“CEMA”) of the same date. The mortgage and CEMA were recorded in August 2013. Lakeview asserted that the Note was endorsed in blank, transferred to Lakeview and that an Assignment of Mortgage from Chase, dated February 6, 2019, was recorded shortly thereafter. Lakeview maintained it had physical possession of the original Note prior to commencing the action in June, 2023 and that Branley had been in default since April 1, 2020.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from