Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2020

Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For SHORT System Reporting Failures

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for Short-Term Obligation Rate Transparency ("SHORT") System reporting and related supervisory failures.

United StatesFinance and Banking

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for Short-Term Obligation Rate Transparency ("SHORT") System reporting and related supervisory failures.

As described in a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that on 3,710 occasions over a period of nine years, the broker-dealer violated MSRB Rule G-34 (specifically MSRB Rule G-34(c)(ii)) as a remarketing agent for variable rate demand obligations. FINRA found that the broker dealer failed to submit accurate minimum denomination and maximum interest rates to the MSRB's SHORT System. Specifically, FINRA found the broker-dealer failed to report the minimum denomination in 2,002 submissions and the maximum interest rate in 1,708 submissions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from