Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2026

EPA And Army Corps Propose Narrower Definitions Affecting WOTUS Jurisdiction

The EPA and Army Corps of Engineers have issued a supplemental proposed rulemaking that significantly narrows the definition of "waters of the United States" under the Clean Water Act, responding to the Supreme Court's Sackett v. EPA decision. The new definitions would limit WOTUS jurisdiction to perennial waters and require wetlands to have continuous surface-water connections, with the most substantial impacts expected in the arid Western United States. Public comments on these proposed changes are due Oc

United StatesEnvironment

EPA and Army Corps Propose Narrower Definitions Affecting WOTUS Jurisdiction

On Sept. 9, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) (collectively, the “Agencies”) published a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“Proposed Rulemaking”) further revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act.

The Proposed Rulemaking supplements the Agencies’ November 2025 proposed rule (“November Proposal”), which also sought to revise the WOTUS definition in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA.

  • There, the Supreme Court found that WOTUS only encompasses waters that are “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing,” and held that wetlands are jurisdictional waters only where they have “a continuous surface connection” to WOTUS.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from