Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2025

Third Circuit Clarifies That FLSA Claims May Be Released By Absent Class Members

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Third Circuit held that Section 216(b) of the FLSA does not prohibit the release of FLSA claims in an opt-out class-action settlement.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Third Circuit held that Section 216(b) of the FLSA does not prohibit the release of FLSA claims in an opt-out class-action settlement.

Settling "hybrid" cases in the Third Circuit just became easier for parties asserting claims under both federal and state wage-and-hour laws.

By way of background, the FLSA provides, in relevant part, that "[n]o employee shall be a party plaintiff to [a FLSA action] unless he gives his consent in writing to become such a party and such consent is filed in the court in which such action is brought." 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Thus, similarly-situated employees do not become plaintiffs in a FLSA case unless they file a consent in writing affirmatively agreeing to become a party-plaintiff. In contrast, in a certified class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, class members are part of the class unless they opt out of the litigation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from