Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2023

FLSA Pleading: Mathematical Precision Not Required

In Abbott v. Comme Des Garcons, Ltd., former employees of the Japanese fashion label's retail store in New York alleged that their regularly scheduled workweek consisted of more than 40 hours of work.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court's decision in Iqbal on the requirement of specificity in pleading provided the guidance that "determining whether a plausible claim has been pled is a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 663-64 (2009). The Second Circuit recently addressed the level of specificity to successfully state a claim for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. In what some might deem a softening of the standard, the court held that Plaintiffs must simply allege 40 hours of work in a workweek as well as some uncompensated time in excess of the 40 hours.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from