Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2015

The Golf Channel Needs A Mulligan

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

"Mulligan," in golf parlance, is the opportunity to hit a golf shot, a "do over," when the previous shot was not quite the one desired by the golfer.

United StatesCriminal Law

"Mulligan," in golf parlance, is the opportunity to hit a golf shot, a "do over," when the previous shot was not quite the one desired by the golfer. The "Mulligan" replaces the previous shot, which then does not count toward the golfer's score. Sometimes depending on the game and rules, the golfer pays for the "Mulligan;" sometimes it's free.

The Golf Channel may be looking for "Mulligan" after the Fifth Circuit's March 11, 2015 opinion in Janvey, Receiver for Stanford International Bank Limited, et al v. The Golf Channel Incorporated, Case No. 13-11305. For two decades, the Bank, through 130 affiliates (collectively "Stanford Financial") ran a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme, promising investors exceptionally high interest in CDs. As in every Ponzi scheme, early investors who get out, do well. Later investors – no so much. Starting in 2005, Stanford Financial attempted to increase awareness of its brand among high net worth individuals, through advertising on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from