Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 AUGUST 2005

The Disney Decision

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

In a detailed 175 page decision, Chancellor William B. Chandler, III held that each of Disney's directors, including Eisner, Eisner's personal attorney, who served as chairperson of the compensation committee, and each of Disney's outside directors, "fulfilled his or her obligation to act in good faith and with honesty of purpose."

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Originally published August 16, 2005

On August 9, 2005, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in the closely followed In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, No. 15452 (Del. Ch. Aug. 9, 2005). Following a 37- day trial, the court entered judgment in favor of the director-defendants and against the stockholder-plaintiffs on all counts. The Court’s detailed and carefully reasoned opinion held that even Boards such as Disney’s, which "[fall] significantly short of the best practices of ideal corporate governance," are still entitled to the protections of the business judgment rule and cannot be monetarily liable provided they make decisions in good faith, "untainted by selfinterest", and "on an informed basis . . . and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interest of the company [and its shareholders]."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from