Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2022

Sandbagging: A Primer

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

In the 19th century, "ruffians roamed the streets" and robbed "unsuspecting victims" using a tactic knowing as "sandbagging": They wielded "ostensibly harmless socks"

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

What Is Sandbagging?

In the 19th century, "ruffians roamed the streets" and robbed "unsuspecting victims" using a tactic knowing as "sandbagging": They wielded "ostensibly harmless socks" that were in fact "filled with sand and used as weapons." 1

Today, sandbagging has a different - and, thankfully, less violent - meaning. It describes a buyer that asserts a claim for breach even though it knew, or had reason to know, before the deal closed that a representation was untrue. In other words, the buyer had knowledge of the breach, or the relevant facts that led to the breach, but went through with the deal anyway, only to bring a claim for breach after closing.

This article explores how transactional practitioners address sandbagging in acquisition agreements, and the default rules that courts may apply when the deal parties are silent on the issue.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from