What Is Sandbagging?
In the 19th century, "ruffians roamed the streets" and
robbed "unsuspecting victims" using a tactic knowing as
"sandbagging": They wielded "ostensibly harmless
socks" that were in fact "filled with sand and used as
weapons." 1
Today, sandbagging has a different - and, thankfully, less
violent - meaning. It describes a buyer that asserts a claim for
breach even though it knew, or had reason to know, before the deal
closed that a representation was untrue. In other words, the buyer
had knowledge of the breach, or the relevant facts that led to the
breach, but went through with the deal anyway, only to bring a
claim for breach after closing.
This article explores how transactional practitioners address
sandbagging in acquisition agreements, and the default rules that
courts may apply when the deal parties are silent on the issue.