Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2020

Federal Register: SEC Requests Input On ICA "Names Rule"

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The SEC requested comment on the effectiveness of the framework governing the names of registered investment companies and business development companies.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The SEC requested comment on the effectiveness of the framework governing the names of registered investment companies and business development companies. The notice was published in the Federal Register. Comments must be received by May 5, 2020.

As previously covered, Investment Company Act ("ICA") Rule 35d-1 ("Names Rule") prohibits registered investment companies from using a name that is likely to mislead investors. Rule 35d-1 provides, in part, that when an investment company refers to a certain type of asset (e.g., equities) in its name, at least 80 percent of the investment company must be invested in that type of asset. The SEC stated that it is assessing whether the existing rule is effective in prohibiting the use of deceptive names of funds, as well as whether alternative frameworks should be considered.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from