Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2008

Dragnet Clause Is Enforceable

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that a dragnet clause within a master security agree¬ment was effective, even though a subsequent loan agreement remained silent as to whether pre-existing collat¬eral secured the new advance.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that a dragnet clause within a master security agreement was effective, even though a subsequent loan agreement remained silent as to whether pre-existing collateral secured the new advance. Universal Guaranty Life Ins. Co. v. Coughlin, 481 F.3d 458 (7th Cir., March 14, 2007).

On April 30, 2002, Marine Bank entered into a loan and security agreement with debtor Health Management Limited Partnership (the "Debtor"), granting Marine Bank a first priority security interest in, among other things, the Debtor's accounts receivable, to secure all "obligations" between the parties. The definition of "obligations" included all indebtednesses between the parties "now existing or hereafter arising" (i.e., a "dragnet" clause). Plaintiff Universal Guaranty Life Insurance Company ("Universal") held a junior lien against the Debtor's accounts receivable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from