Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2026

NAD Reviews Popularity Claims

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

When Nanit claimed its baby monitors were the "most loved" and "most awarded," competitor Owlet challenged the advertising. NAD's decision reveals critical standards for popularity claims, examining whether Amazon reviews and industry awards can substantiate superiority messages in competitive markets.

United StatesConsumer Protection

This week, NAD announced a decision in a dispute between Owlet and Nanit, two companies that make smart baby monitors. Although the decision covers a lot of ground, today we’ll just focus on a topic that regularly comes up across many industries—popularity claims. Specifically, we’ll look at what NAD had to say about Nanit’s claims that its products were the “most loved,” “#1 most loved,” “internet’s favorite,” and “most awarded.” 

“Most Loved” and “Favorite” Require Proof

Nanit first argued that claims such as “most loved,” “#1 most loved,” and “internet’s favorite” were puffery, but NAD rejected that argument, holding that a reasonable consumer would expect these types of claims to be supported by objective evidence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from