Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2026

California Prop 65: DEA Judgment Reinforces First Amendment Limits On Warning Requirements

A stipulated judgment between The Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) and the California Attorney General reinforces First Amendment limits on certain warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65...

United StatesConsumer Protection

A stipulated judgment between The Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) and the California Attorney General reinforces First Amendment limits on certain warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65, which requires businesses to provide warnings for exposures to chemicals listed by the State as causing cancer or reproductive harm unless an exemption applies. The judgment resolves a challenge to warnings for diethanolamine (DEA) in cosmetics and personal care products and follows recent decisions rejecting compelled Prop 65 messages where the required message goes beyond what the underlying science supports. Going forward, state and private enforcers are permanently enjoined from pursuing Prop 65 enforcement actions based on an alleged failure to warn regarding exposures to DEA in cosmetics and personal care products. Companies facing pending or threatened Prop 65 enforcement activity involving DEA or other listed chemicals with disputed toxicity evidence should consider

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from