Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2022

Not Guilty: Some Lessons From DOJ's Recent Criminal Antitrust Trials

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

As previously discussed on this blog, the DOJ Antitrust Division faced a pair of setbacks in its labor-market enforcement agenda two days in a row in April of this year.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

As previously discussed on this blog, the DOJ Antitrust Division faced a pair of setbacks in its labor-market enforcement agenda two days in a row in April of this year. The first was in United States v. Jindal, et al., where the Division charged the owner and the former clinical director of a physical therapist staffing company for a conspiracy to fix wages. Both defendants were found not guilty of wage fixing, although the owner was convicted of obstruction of justice. The second was in United States v. DaVita, Inc., et al., where the Division charged DaVita and its former CEO with conspiring with three competitors not to solicit each others' senior employees. This trial resulted in not guilty verdicts for both the company and the former CEO on all charges.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from